The problem of racism, when examined through the lens of Christian theology, is revealed as not only morally abhorrent but also intellectually untenable. Atheism, which lacks a transcendent basis for moral judgments, fails to offer a coherent framework for condemning racism, or any form of injustice, with ultimate authority. If human beings are merely the result of an unguided evolutionary process, as posited by atheistic naturalism, then there is little grounding for the belief in the inherent dignity or equality of all people. From this atheistic perspective, discriminatory ideologies such as racism can be viewed as consistent with a worldview that places no intrinsic value on human life beyond survival or societal utility. Historical proponents of this view include Thomas Huxley, a leading advocate of Darwinism, who, in his 1865 essay Emancipation - Black and White, asserted the purported racial inferiority of Black individuals in relation to White individuals. Within an atheistic framework, human beings are often reduced to mere biological entities, without a divinely ordained purpose, making it difficult to mount an argument for racial equality beyond pragmatic social cohesion.
In contrast, Christian theology, grounded in the belief in a personal, loving Creator, not only condemns racism but deems it entirely absurd. Through a systematic examination of theological principles, it becomes evident that racism violates the core tenets of Christian doctrine. The following five theological propositions establish the moral and intellectual incoherence of racism within a Christian worldview.
The Imago Dei: The Image of God in All Humanity
The foundational Christian belief that all human beings are created in the Imago Dei - the image of God - renders any form of racism profoundly antithetical to Christian ethics. According to the biblical narrative in Genesis 1:26-27, God created humankind uniquely in His image, setting them apart from the rest of creation. This divine imprint is bestowed upon all human beings, regardless of ethnicity or nationality. The Apostle Paul, in his address to the Athenians, declares that all people are the offspring of God (Acts 17:28-29), underscoring the theological unity of humanity. The Greek term esmen in Acts 17:28, translated as "we are," conveys the ongoing reality of humanity's connection to God as His image-bearers. Similarly, James 3:9 admonishes believers for cursing those made in the likeness of God. The participle gegonotas, used here, emphasizes that all people continue to bear the divine image, a reality that transcends superficial differences such as race or ethnicity.
Thus, racism is not only an offense against fellow human beings but an affront to the Creator Himself. To discriminate based on race is to deny the inherent dignity that comes from being made in God's likeness. Theologically, every human life carries equal value, and racism becomes a violation of this fundamental truth.
The Unity of the Human Race
Christian theology asserts that there is only one human race, a truth that renders racism both ethically unjustifiable and intellectually irrational. While humanity exhibits a diversity of physical and cultural characteristics, these differences are superficial variations within a single, divinely created human family. The biblical account affirms that all people are descendants of a common ancestor—Adam—created by God (Genesis 3:20). Furthermore, the Apostle Paul, in Acts 17:26, affirms that God "made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth." This theological claim is supported by contemporary scientific research, which classifies all human beings as members of a single species, Homo sapiens. The notion of distinct biological "races" is scientifically erroneous and theologically unfounded.
Racism, therefore, is not only a moral failure but also a denial of both divine revelation and scientific fact. To divide humanity along racial lines is to reject the unity that God established and affirmed in creation.
Divine Impartiality and Human Responsibility
The impartiality of God, as consistently taught throughout Scripture, serves as a model for human behavior and decisively condemns all forms of racial discrimination. The Old and New Testaments affirm that God shows no partiality and that His love and justice extend to all people. Moses, in Deuteronomy 10:17-19, praises God's justice and His care for the marginalized, including foreigners and strangers. The Apostle Peter, in Acts 10:34-35, explicitly declares that God "shows no partiality, but in every nation anyone who fears him and does what is right is acceptable to him." This divine impartiality is further affirmed by Paul in Galatians 2:6, where he emphasizes that God does not judge by external appearances.
Thus, any form of racism stands in direct opposition to God's nature and His call for believers to emulate His justice. James 2:1 admonishes Christians not to show favoritism, making it clear that partiality based on race or social status is incompatible with the Christian faith. Racism, therefore, is not only a moral transgression but a failure to reflect the character of God.
Love as the Antithesis of Racism
The Christian ethic of love is fundamentally opposed to racism. Rooted in the command to love both God and neighbor, the Gospel mandates that believers reject all forms of hatred, prejudice, and discrimination. In Galatians 5:22-23, Paul describes love as a fruit of the Spirit, and in 1 Corinthians 13:4-6, he details the attributes of Christian love, which is patient, kind, and devoid of arrogance or malice. Racism, fueled by hatred and ignorance, is the direct antithesis of the love Christians are called to embody.
In 1 John 4:20-21, the Apostle John underscores the incongruity of claiming to love God while harboring hatred toward one's brother. True Christian love transcends racial and ethnic boundaries, reflecting the divine love that knows no partiality. As Paul writes in Romans 13:9-10, love fulfills the law, and any form of racism is a violation of this law. Within the framework of Christian ethics, racism cannot coexist with the command to love.
Jesus Christ: The Savior of All Humanity
The universality of Christ's salvific work further underscores the absurdity of racism. From the beginning of Scripture, it is clear that God's plan of salvation extends to all nations. In Genesis 12:3, God promises Abraham that "in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed," and this promise finds its fulfillment in Jesus Christ. The Gospel, as articulated in John 3:16, proclaims that God sent His Son to save the world, not a select group of people based on race or ethnicity. The Apostle Paul affirms this universality in Romans 1:16, where he writes that the Gospel is "the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes."
Through Christ, all barriers of race and ethnicity are broken down, as Paul declares in Galatians 3:28: "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus." Racism, then, is a denial of the unifying work of Christ, who reconciles all people to God and to one another.
Conclusion
In conclusion, racism is not only a moral and social evil but a profound theological error. Christian theology, grounded in the doctrines of the Imago Dei, the unity of the human race, divine impartiality, and the universal love of Christ, renders racism both absurd and indefensible. As followers of Christ, believers are called to reject all forms of prejudice and to affirm the inherent dignity and worth of every human being, regardless of race. In doing so, they bear witness to the transforming power of the Gospel, which unites all people in the love of God.
References
1. Thomas Huxley, "Emancipation—Black and White," 1865.
2. Eric Lyons, "The Moral Argument for the Existence of God," 2011.
3. Eric Lyons and Kyle Butt, "Darwin, Evolution, and Racism," 2009.
4. Jo Marchant, "We Should Act Like the Animals We Are," “New Scientist”, 2008, 200(2678): 44-45.
5. William D. Mounce, “Basics of Biblical Greek” (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1993).
Comments